Left of the Hill

RSS Feed Type: Atom 1.0
RSS Feed: http://leftofthehill.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
Link: http://leftofthehill.blogspot.com

This feed has a new item on average once every 3.29 days.

Last updated: 6/17/2010 9:22:01 PM
Last fetched: 7/29/2010 10:28:25 PM
Next fetch (est.): 7/30/2010 11:28:25 AM

Aggregated Items: 606
Newest: 6/17/2010 9:22:00 PM
Oldest: 2/7/2009 8:26:00 PM

Items


Left of the Hill · Joe Biden on Rep. Joe Barton's Apology to BP RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

There's always jokes about Joe Biden occasionally having foot in mouth disease (he even jokes about it in this video), but it's times like this when I'm proud to say that I voted for Biden for VP. He's absolutely correct in pointing out that we absolutely must hold corporations accountable when they make mistakes that have a negative impact on the public and it is indeed "outrageous" for Rep. Joe Barton to suggest otherwise.

line 3 column 575 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 584 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 589 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &
line 3 column 592 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 643 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 698 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 754 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 763 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 768 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 706 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · Keith Fimian Says Taking Away the Public's Right to Vote for US Senators has "Some Merit" RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

After his campaign in 2008 it became painfully obvious that Keith Fimian was member of the far right, but it appears as though he's become even more out of touch with reality. During an interview he gave with Mark Platkin on WTOP, Fimian said that he thought there was "some merit" in taking away the right of the American people to vote for their US Senators and that he didn't know why we were allowed to do so in the first place.

What makes this position interesting is that it illustrates the hypocrisy of Fimian and other tea party leaders. They claim that they want to empower the public and not the government, but at the same time they are actually promoting a policy that would literally take a democratic vote away from the people and give it to politicians down in the state capitals. That absolutely wrecks of cronyism and would work to ensure that the US Senate was even less representative of the American public.

line 3 column 1085 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 1094 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 1099 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 1102 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 1153 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 1208 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 1264 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 1273 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 1278 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 1216 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · Good Night, and Good Luck RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

As many of you already know, I will be moving to Rochester, NY to take a job with a non-profit voter education organization. Much like the work that I have been doing here in Virginia, the organization focuses on various issues including economic and social justice, peace, and education. When you combine the great reputation of the organization I’ll be joining with the history of activism in Rochester (Susan B. Anthony and Frederick Douglass both spent a significant amount of time in Rochester and it was also a stop on the underground railroad), I’m really excited about making the move and being able to continue giving back to the community.

I’ve had a few people ask what will be happening with Left of the Hill now that I’ll be moving out of Virginia. As you might have already noticed, the posting has slowed down as I’ve been preparing to move and I’ve decided to go on hiatus while I settle into Rochester and my new position. While I haven’t decided exactly how long that hiatus will last, I will most definitely be back to blogging eventually. Since I plan on staying in touch with many of my sources here, I’ll occasionally write about Virginia when Left of the Hill returns from hiatus but there will also be a focus on New York and federal issues as well.

Over the years I’ve been fortunate to become friends with some amazing folks from both sides of the aisle and I want to thank all of my readers, volunteers, and fellow activists for making my time in Virginia politics a very enjoyable one. My email address (leftofthehill@gmail.com) will still be up and running and I encourage people to keep in touch.

In solidarity,
Bryan

Left of the Hill · Gerry Connolly Speaks About Health Care Reform at GMU RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

As part of their senior project, graduating seniors at GMU in the social work program joined forces with AARP to work on the project “Voices for Change: Project Healthcare.” Through having each student interview two older members of the community to discuss their struggles with health care and what they’d like to see result from the health insurance reform bill. What resulted were stories of older adults that had been affected by pre-existing conditions, problems with the Medicare Part D coverage gap, long term care issues, difficulty navigating the health care systems, and hopes that the health insurance reform bill will help (which it will).

At the culmination of their project was a press conference yesterday which featured students and AARP members who had participated in the project, officials from GMU, and Rep. Gerry Connolly who was there to listen to what the students had learned and speak about the health insurance reform bill. One of the interesting aspects of this press conference was that it featured to groups that arguably have the most to benefit from the bill -- college students who will be able to stay on their parent’s health insurance plan as they’re finishing school and looking for a job (a concept that got a lot of applause) and seniors who (among other things) will benefit from the closing of the donut hole.

What was also very interesting about this press conference was that it focused on some of the personal stories that the students collected during the semester. Since we‘ve heard a lot about the political side of the debate surrounding the new law, it‘s rewarding to hear directly for the public about how they‘ll be able to benefit from reform. In a conversation after the press conference, Rep. Gerry Connolly highlighted the personal stories. One of the things he said we could take away from the event, for instance, is the fact that “when you listen, everyone has a story about health care.” Whether those personal stories covered issues such as care giving, pre-existing conditions, having coverage rescinded, or not being able to afford health insurance, Gerry stressed that he’s heard from a variety of constituents about their horror stories with health insurance companies. That is why he was proud to support a piece of legislation that will help to address those issues.

With that in mind, here’s the video of Gerry speaking yesterday.

line 3 column 2577 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 2586 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 2591 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 2594 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 2645 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 2700 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 2756 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 2765 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 2770 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 2708 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · Lafayette Park Closed Down to Prevent Media Coverage of Protest Supporting DADT Repeal RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

While he mentioned the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell in his State of the Union Address and there is currently a study taking place on the issue, there is still a lot more that President Obama could be doing to prevent discrimination based upon sexual orientation in our armed forces. That is why there are a number of organizations like Get Equal that are taking action to demand that action be taken on the issue through the Defense Authorization Bill (DAB) that will be coming up for renewal soon. According to Get Equal, “the DAB provides a way to repeal DADT immediately. And you know that repealing the policy quickly and decisively is the right thing to do for LGBT servicemembers and for all of the armed forces.”

It’s definitely a good thing that we’re seeing some progress on these issues, but I tend to agree that we need to put pressure on the Obama Administration if we want to see discrimination based upon sexual orientation end in our country’s military. After all, it’s clear that there’s going to be plenty of delays in repealing DADT if the public doesn’t speak up because the White House is already backing off it‘s promises to encourage a vote on the issue this year. The clear implication of this is that he isn’t willing to take a political risk on the issue before the mid-term elections. Supporters of repealing DADT therefore have to make it clear that failure to move forward with the repeal could also have some political repercussions.

Realizing that the Democrats are likely going to lose seats in Congress during the mid-term elections, which could then give the White House yet another excuse not to move forward on repealing DADT, activists from Get Equal have been holding protests outside of the White House that call for Obama to display more leadership on the issue. Following up on the action that Lt. Dan Choi did a few weeks ago, Lt. Choi was joined by five other service members (Capt. Jim Pietrangelo, Petty Officer Larry Whitt, Petty Officer Autumn Sandeen, Cadet Mara Boyd, and Cpl. Evelyn Thomas) who showed their solidarity and support for the repeal of DADT by chaining themselves to a fence outside of the White House.

Instead of taking the hint that this was an issue where we need to move forward, it turns out that efforts were made to make sure the activists couldn’t even get their point across to the general public who were in the area at the time. As the folks over at AmericaBlog caught on video, the situation raised even more questions when security actually closed down Lafayette Park and ordered the media to leave. When the White House is already backtracking on promises they’ve made regarding DADT, it certainly doesn’t look good that a public park is being closed down in a blatant attempt to prevent the media from covering a protest. So the question now becomes: Will the president take leadership on the repeal of DADT, or are we going to see the White House continue trying to dismiss the calls for action?

line 3 column 3251 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 3260 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 3265 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 3268 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 3319 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 3374 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 3430 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 3439 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 3444 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 3382 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · A Look At How Virginia's Delegation Faired on ADA's Congressional Scorecard RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) has become well known for have a long history of standing up for progressive causes. In addition to the grassroots movements that the organization has been involved with since it’s founding in the 1940’s, the scorecard ADA releases every year based on crucial votes in Congress has also become something that’s really examined by leaders on both sides of the aisle to see were certain legislators fall. In a post over at the Huffington Post, Michael J. Wilson (ADA’s National Director) wrote about how this year’s results at the national level appear to support the argument that things have become more partisan in recent years on the Hill.
Judging by our scorecard, all the talk about growing political polarization has a basis in fact. We score 20 votes in each house, on a wide range of foreign and domestic issues. In 2007, there were 53 House members who achieved a perfect score (our "ADA Heroes"), and 43 who got every vote wrong (the Zeros). In the latest survey, the ranks of the Heroes swelled to 98, but there were also a lot more Zeros--75. In the Senate, the three Heroes of '07 became 16 last year. (Zeros are generally scarcer in the Upper Chamber: 3 in '07, 1 last year.)
If you take a look at what happened in Virginia, however, it appears as though it’s only the Republicans who are involved in the extreme partisanship. 3 of the 5 Republicans in the Virginia Congressional Delegation (Cantor, Goodlatte, and Forbes) all scored a 0 on ADA’s scorecard. This is important to note because you truly have to work extremely hard to make sure you vote the wrong way on every single bill that was being considered for the scorecard. What’s really a shame is that ADA has been focusing on things like it’s Working Families Win project in recent years, which means that these folks are really voting against working class families during an extremely tough economic time.

Now Frank Wolf and Rob Wittman might not have scored a 0, but they still didn’t show too much of a desire to pass productive legislation. Wittman scored a 5% because he voted the wrong way on almost every bill, but did support H.R. 626 which gave federal employees the ability to take up to 4 weeks leave to help care for a newborn child. Wolf managed to score a 10% because he voted in favor of HR 2, a motion that helped provide health insurance to children by concurring with the Senate amendment to reauthorize the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).

Virginia’s Democrats in the House of Representatives had a variety in how they scored, but averaged a 81%. Here are the individual scores.

Glenn Nye -- 70%
Bobby Scott -- 95%
Tom Perriello -- 70%
Jim Moran -- 85%
Rick Boucher -- 75%
Gerry Connolly -- 95%

In the Senate, Mark Warner scored a 95% and Jim Webb scored a 100%. For those of you whose interested, you can now compare those results to the “snapshot” below of the national averages.

Untitled
line 3 column 585 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&src"
line 3 column 3274 - Warning: <a> proprietary attribute "imageanchor"
line 3 column 3452 - Warning: <img> lacks "alt" attribute

Left of the Hill · Pat Herrity has Poor Showing For Quarterly Financial Numbers RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

With the quarterly financial numbers coming in from the campaigns, there has been some numbers coming in for the candidates in Virginia's 11th District. In the Republican primary, Pat Herrity appears to be rolling through all his money relatively quickly. With two months to go until the primary, FEC reports show he has less than $200,000 cash on hand. On top of that he has $25,000 in debt and another $5,000 that can only be used in the general election. Based upon the fact that Keith Fimian will be able to self fund his campaign and Herrity's already spending a lot of money on overhead and staff, it looks like Herrity will have very little money left in the bank if he wins the Republican nomination.

These financial numbers are important because the Republicans are already very divided in who they are supporting. Considering that there has already been a lot of bad blood between the two campaigns, things are likely to only get worse during the final two months of the primary. The eventually Republican nominee could therefore benefit from having some money in the bank to help restore his reputation after the bitter battle he'll emerge from. Based upon the numbers we're seeing from Pat Herrity's campaign, however, it appears as though he'll have to face the difficultly of restoring his reputation after the primary at the same time that he's desperately trying to raise money for the general election. In other words, things aren't looking to good for Pat Herrity.

UPDATE: In sharp contrast to the poor numbers that Herrity is reporting, I just received word that Gerry Connolly has over $1 million cash on hand and raised over $450,000 in the first quarter. What's even more impressive about Gerry's numbers is that he received a large amount of his support from over 1,500 individual grassroots supporters who attended events such as his annual St. Patrick's Day gathering. As people begin to pay more and more attention to this election, I also expect that we'll see Gerry continue to produce good fundraising numbers which means he'll have a significant financial advantage of his Republican opponent. When you combine this with Gerry's history of providing good constituent services to people in the district, this is absolutely a great sign for his campaign.

Left of the Hill · Rich Anthony Drops Out of Democratic Primary in 10th CD RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

After running a good campaign in the 10th Congressional District and putting forward some strong, progressive ideas, Rich Anthony has announced that he will be dropping out of the race for Congress due to medical reasons.
Dear Friends,

It is with great disappointment that I must announce that I will no longer be a candidate for the Democratic nomination for the United States Congress in the 10th district of Virginia.

Over the past 3-4 weeks I have been experiencing a reoccurrence of a back injury I suffered years ago. While I attempted to push through the pain and continue on, I found myself in an orthopedic surgeon's office on Monday. He gave me the news I hoped I would never hear, I need to have surgery on my back.

After discussing all of my options, I was told that postponing the surgery until after the election could result in permanent nerve damage. The best case scenario puts my recovery at 4 to 6 weeks. During that time I would not be able to actively campaign. With only 8 weeks until the election, such a time frame simply does not allow me to run an effective primary campaign. So, in conjunction with my doctor and my family, I have come to the sad conclusion that I must end my campaign for congress in Virginia's 10th district.

The decision is disappointing, and was difficult to make. I truly feel that with my background in economic and workforce development and my strong message of getting our economy on the right track would have made me a strong alternative to Frank Wolf in the fall. But I believe this is the best decision for my family and me.

I want to thank all of my supporters, my staff and my family for all of their help. I can't put into words how much it has meant to me personally. I will contact as many of you as I can in the days ahead.

Once my treatment is complete I intend to do everything I can to support Jeff Barnett's campaign and focus on our ultimate objective, defeating Frank Wolf in the Fall.

All my best,
Richard Anthony
As Lowell mentioned when he posted Rich's statement, "this is a bummer." I've been grateful to have the opportunity to talk with Rich on numerous occasions over the last few months and thought he would make an excellent Member of Congress. He was passionate about making a difference and I'm confident he would have truly stood up for the working class if he was elected. When he came to the Inside Scoop studios recently to take part in a debate, his family was also there with him and it was extremely obvious that his wife and kids really enjoy his self described "dry sense of humor" and passion for what he does. I sincerely hope that makes the treatment process go a little easier for Rich and I certainly hope this isn't the last we see of him because he brings a whole lot to the table.

Left of the Hill · Constance McMillen to be Grand Marshall of NYC Pride Parade RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Untitled With Pride coming up in just a couple of months (most cities hold their Pride festivities in June), NYC Pride has just announced that Constance McMillen will be one of the Grand Marshalls of the NYC Pride Parade. For those of you who don’t know, Constance is a high school student from Mississippi who fought back when her high school wouldn’t let her bring her girlfriend to the prom. In fact, the school was so intent of promoting discrimination that it actually canceled the entire prom in order to prevent Constance from bringing her date to the dance.

In order to combat this blatant discrimination by her school, Constance decided to file a lawsuit with the ACLU. That lawsuit has had some mixed results as a federal judge did rule that the school had violated Constance’s first amendment rights, but he didn’t force the school to still have the prom “because of assurances that an alternative ‘private’ prom being planned by parents would be open to all students.” While that would have been somewhat acceptable if all students were indeed invited to attend, it turns out even that wasn’t exactly the entire truth. While there was indeed a private prom that was supposed to help the school avoid the lawsuit, it turns out there was yet another one held in a nearby town. The third prom is where the vast majority of students went, but Constance wasn’t allowed to attend it. In other words, discrimination was allowed to continue.

Nonetheless, there were some good results from the situation as Ellen DeGeneres gave Constance a $30,000 scholarship check and there has now been a significant amount of attention brought to the discrimination that still takes place in some school systems. In order for Constance McMillen’s courage to be truly honored, however, we must take the lessons from this situation and use them to make sure that school systems aren’t allowed to get away with discrimination in the future. That will primarily be accomplished through having discussions with the general public about the topic and having Constance be a grand marshal at the NYC Pride Parade is one small way of making sure the public hears about the discrimination that still takes place in some school systems.
line 3 column 103 - Warning: <a> proprietary attribute "imageanchor"
line 3 column 305 - Warning: <img> lacks "alt" attribute

Left of the Hill · Right Wingers Express Anger Over Positive Reaction to Obama Throwing out Ceremonial First Pitch RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Baseball fans are used to various community figures throwing out the ceremonial first pitches a few minutes before the game starts. While me might not know much about the people throwing the pitch or agree with all of their politics (if their a politician), fans usually show respect towards the person who’s there making the throw. Even as someone who couldn’t stand President Bush, for instance, I had to admit that I was impressed by his arm after I saw him throw out a ceremonial first pitch on TV once. Based upon what I’ve heard from people who were there and was able to gather from the coverage of the game, that tradition was followed yesterday as there was an overwhelmingly response to President Obama throwing out the first pitch at Nationals’ Park. A lot of people even got a kick out of him wearing a Nationals jacket and then whipping out his Chicago White Sox hat before making his throw.

Since presidents have been throwing out the first pitch at baseball games for generations (especially when we actually had a team in DC), this is simply a unique opportunity for fans to show their respect for the office of the presidency and for a game filled with tradition. That’s why I was honestly quite surprised when I saw that there were a number of right wingers who were using this as an opportunity to bash Obama. When a baseball blogger for the Washington Post reported that it was a “roughly 90 percent” positive response to Obama, for instance, the right tried to hijack the post and spin it as though this was the media supposedly trying to do anything to make Obama look good. Here’s what someone using the name “Thomas Payne” had to say about it.
Untitled
Later on, another commenter referred to Obama as the “little dictator.” Not only does this type of rhetoric not help the political debate in any situation, it’s most definitely out of place in a discussion that’s supposed to be celebrating the arrival of the baseball season and was as non-political as you could get.

Fortunately, there were a number of people who made the point that not everything had to be political and that it was simply wrong for his critics to be trying to spread their hatred in reaction to Obama’s appearance. As one person who referred to himself as “Lefty McLefterson” put it, he “did clap for President on Opening Day in Nationals Park […] because the president came to our ballpark as a guest.” Others insisted that baseball was a game where we could all come together and put politics aside.

Although I think there is definitely room to speak about baseball and American culture, I agree with the sentiments that the attempts to turn a blatantly non-political discussion into a thread of hate filled comments that bash the president is simply unacceptable. In my opinion, it’s simply a shame that there are some people out there who are filled with so much anger that they have to promote it whenever they see even a remote opportunity to do so.
line 3 column 1894 - Warning: <a> proprietary attribute "imageanchor"
line 3 column 2088 - Warning: <img> lacks "alt" attribute

Left of the Hill · Televised Debate Tonight for Democratic Primary in the 10th CD RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

As many of you already know, I'm a member of the crew for the Inside Scoop (and sometimes even appear as a guest to talk about grassroots politics or blogging). I bring this up because tonight's show should be worth tuning into because it'll be a debate between the two Democratic candidates for Congress in Virginia's 10th Congressional District -- Rich Anthony and Jeff Barnett. The hour long debate will begin at 7pm and can be viewed on Channel 10 by Fairfax County residents. If you live outside of Fairfax, however, you can also view the debate online by following this link. It's also worth noting that one of my responsibilities for the show is monitoring the chatroom on the online platform, so feel free to leave comments, ask questions, etc there if you so desire.

Left of the Hill · Unique Protest Calling for Marriage Equality RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

With same sex marriage now legal in our nation’s capital, I know many people who have decided to make the very short trip from Northern Virginia into DC in order to legally get married. As soon as they cross the Potomac on their way back to Virginia, however, they are in a state that refuses to recognize their relationship. LGBT activists aren‘t the only ones noticing this as the policy is also having an impact on the local economy. Businesses like Northrup Grumman, for instance, are taking the discriminatory policy into consideration while deciding whether or not they want to move their headquarters to Virginia.

Being able to get married just a few miles from your home while not having the marriage legally recognized in your home state is something that many LGBT couples are facing across the country now that there are a number of states that recognize same-sex marriage. Couples in Nebraska, for instance, can get married in Iowa even though Nebraska won’t recognize the marriage. In order to highlight how traveling such a short distance can result in people being stripped of their basic civil rights, protesters marched to Bob Kerrey Pedestrian Bridge which connects the two states.
"We live in Omaha and we get no benefits," Brenner said. "We wanted to get married on the first day available and we want Nebraska to join with Iowa and make it happen."

"We pay taxes. We vote. We serve our country," said Beckstead. "I don't think Nebraska understood that we want to continue."

Supporters of same-sex marriage said they plan to continue to spread their message of equality and they hope others will listen.

"This is about civil rights, not religious rights," said JoAnne Palmer.
In a time when we see the Tea Party folks protesting by holding up hate filled signs and shouting slurs at members of Congress, it’s refreshing to actually hear about a protest where people are literally standing up for their right to have a loving, committed relationship recognized. I certainly hope we see a similar protest in the DC area using the walking lane on a bridge connecting DC and Virginia (perhaps the Key Bridge).

Left of the Hill · You Got to Love the Fenway Faithful and Watching Baseball While Helping Democrats RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Many of you already know that I’m a very big baseball fan, so it shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise that I’m excited about the season that officially starting tonight with a game between the Boston Red Sox and the New York Yankees (arguably the biggest rivalry in professional sports). I'll be cheering on the Red Sox tonight, in part because you simply have to love the Fenway Faithful and everyone that makes up Red Sox nation.



If you're like me and are a big Nationals fan, then there's also some opportunities for you to take in a game and support the Springfield Democratic Committee. At the April 25 and March 16 games, the Springfield Democratic Committee will be at Pfitner Stadium in Woodbridge to watch the Potomac Nationals (Washington's Class A-Advanced minor league affiliate) play. The games are both on Sunday afternoons and you get tickets at $8 a piece. If you're interested, you can purchase tickets by following this link.

If you've ever been to a P-Nats game, you know you know you can get an up close and personal look at players who could potentially be playing in the Majors very soon. Last year, for instance, I attended several games and was able chat on several occasions with Drew Storen who the Nats picked with the 10th overall pick in last year's draft and is likely to be called up to the majors this year. If you have kids who are baseball fans, it's also very easy for them to get autographs as the crowds are relatively small and the players are eager to please the fans. All in all, that means coming out to watch a P-Nats game is definitely worth it. The fact that going through this program will also help the Springfield Democratic Committee, in my opinion, purchasing your tickets through the committee for one of those two games only makes it even better.
line 3 column 781 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&publisherID"
line 3 column 897 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&playerID"
line 3 column 918 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&domain"
line 3 column 931 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 1260 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&publisherID"
line 3 column 1332 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&playerID"
line 3 column 1353 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&domain"
line 3 column 1366 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 1176 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · Florida Republican Doctor Tells Democrats To Seek Coverage Elsewhere RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Between wasting taxpayer money on frivolous lawsuits challenging the health care reform law and tea party activists threatening people who voted in favor of the legislation, we've seen the GOP take various forms of opposition to the new health care reform law that will provide health insurance for millions of previously uninsured Americans and make it more affordable for those who already had coverage. It appears as though there's yet another form of expressing opposition to the new law -- Republican doctors encouraging Obama supporters to seek care elsewhere.

Dr. Jack Cassell is a urologist in Florida who is active in the local Republican Party and is married to a Republican candidate for County Commissioner. Cassell claims he doesn't quiz people on their political beliefs, but he has previously attempted to push his political beliefs on patients and has posted a sign on the office window suggesting that Democrats should seek other coverage because "changes to your healthcare begin right now."
"I'm not turning anybody away — that would be unethical," Dr. Jack Cassell, 56, a Mount Dora urologist and a registered Republican opposed to the health plan, told the Orlando Sentinel on Thursday. "But if they read the sign and turn the other way, so be it."

The sign reads: "If you voted for Obama … seek urologic care elsewhere. Changes to your healthcare begin right now, not in four years."

[...]

In his waiting room, Cassell also has provided his patients with photocopies of a health-care timeline produced by Republican leaders that outlines "major provisions" in the health-care package. The doctor put a sign above the stack of copies that reads: "This is what the morons in Washington have done to your health care. Take one, read it and vote out anyone who voted for it."
Throughout the entire debate process, Republicans frequently tried to mislead the public by suggesting that the Democrats wanted to get in the way of the general public receiving medical care. Even if you were willing to buy into those lies during the actual debate, the actions by the doctor and Republican activist raise a lot of questions about the truth of those statements.

Left of the Hill · Cuccinelli's Office Caught Spreading More Anti-Government Myths RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Whether it was through claiming that social security numbers are a way for the government to spy on people or suggesting that President Obama wasn't born in the United States, Ken Cuccinelli has proven that he's willing to promote conspiracy theories if they might win him some political points. It now appears as though Ken Cuccinelli's office is giving people false information so that they might decide not to provide the Census Bureau with information.
For a story published Sunday by the Richmond Times-Dispatch about privacy concerns with the census, Gottstein released a statement on behalf of Cuccinelli encouraging residents to participate in the 2010 census. The statement added that census workers “might ask for basic financial information, such as salary range, but participants are legally allowed to refuse to answer these questions if they do not feel comfortable giving out that information.”

However, after being contacted this week by McGee, Gottstein acknowledged the mistake and said in an e-mail that he forwarded information from another state’s attorney general without verifying it with the Census Bureau. He said the Virginia attorney general’s office has not focused on census-participation issues but has been interested in helping people protect their identities from imposter census workers.
What makes the statement released by Cuccinelli's office very interesting is that the 2010 Census doesn't even include a question that asks about household income. The fact that Cuccinelli's office was so willing to spread this misinformation about the actual Census illustrates how they're willing to promote their anti-government agenda without even checking the information that they have. When you also consider that another Attorney General's office supposedly sent this information to Cuccinelli's office, you get a prime example of how he has a national reputation of someone who is willing to place the right wing's agenda above providing his constituents with reliable information.

Now Cuccinelli's office claims that they were putting forward this information so that "imposter census workers" can't obtain private information from the public. This explanation is simply baloney. If Cuccinelli was actually interested in preventing "imposters" from obtaining information, his office should be educating the public about how to identify census workers (here's a video on how you can do that). By not providing this information to the public and focusing instead on spreading myths about the census and encouraging people not to provide information, Cuccinelli's office is simply making it clear that they are interested in spreading the fear of government that the Tea Party leaders are promoting. When you combine this with his recent comments about how he thinks the job is "pretty boring" when he's not wasting taxpayer money on lawsuits that say the EPA shouldn't be using science or challenging laws that help provide Virginians with health care, we have a clear picture of how Cuccinelli's office is placing his own right wing agenda ahead of doing the grunt work that could actually benefit the general public.

Left of the Hill · Pat Herrity's Hypocrisy Shines Yet Again RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

As I pointed out in an earlier post regarding his inability to show up to meetings on transportation issues, it appears as though Pat Herrity is once again trying to make campaign promises that are in direct contrast to his own situation as a politician. The latest incarnation comes as he is proposing that Board of Supervisor offices receive a budget cut of 10 to 15 percent. While it is reasonable to assume that there could be some sort of a cut to the budget for these offices (Democratic members of the Board have suggested a 5 percent cut), it becomes obvious that this is purely a political stunt for Herrity as he actually has the highest paid employee.

This isn’t anything new for Herrity as I have been told by several Supervisors and staff members that he is the most partisan Supervisor that they can remember. Fortunately, this time there is someone who is publicly calling Herrity out for his behavior.
"I find it ironic that Herrity threw out that number when he has the highest-paid employee of all of us," McKay said of the proposal. "If I was paying my people what Herrity paid his chief of staff, maybe I wouldn't have a retention issue."

Herrity devoted more than a quarter of his budget -- $117,000 -- to his chief of staff, Dave Foreman, who worked for former Virginia Rep. Tom Davis.
It’s important to note that the issue on hand is Pat Herrity’s hypocrisy regarding budgetary issues, not Foreman’s right to make a living. In other words, Herrity is a hypocrite for spending almost $30,000 more on a single employee than anyone else on the Board at the same time that he’s ranting about government waste in campaign emails and trying to have the highest proposed cuts to the Supervisor offices.

The hypocrisy continued when a blogger who holds an odd personal grudge against several local elected officials (especially the Democrat Herrity would run against if he wins the Republican nomination for Congress in Virginia's 11th CD) tried to excuse Herrity’s behavior by saying that he was being bullied. Seeing an opportunity here, Herrity’s supporters went into the comment section of the post and claimed that we shouldn’t be talking about this because they believed it was “distasteful” to discuss someone’s salary and that we shouldn‘t be attacking Foreman for making a living. Untitled Of course, the Republican response here completely misses the point that this is taxpayer money that is going to paying the salaries in question and they are therefore public information. Unless the Republicans all of a sudden want to change course and say there should be no accountability in how the government spends money, then it is merely hypocritical to claim that this discussion shouldn’t be taking place. Considering how this is especially the case in this situation because they are directly contradicting Pat Herrity’s claim that he’s going to fight government waste, the Republican response is also clearly an attempt to avoid addressing the contradiction between what Herrity does as an elected official and what he says on the campaign trail.
line 3 column 2886 - Warning: <a> proprietary attribute "imageanchor"
line 3 column 3055 - Warning: <img> lacks "alt" attribute

Left of the Hill · Cuccinelli Finds His Job "Pretty Boring" When He's Not Wasting Taxpayer Money on Frivolous Lawsuits RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Most people who knew Ken Cuccinelli (or had at least followed his career in public office) before he ran for Attorney General were well aware of the fact that his politics were to the far right. When he started running for AG, we even warned that he would be promoting an extremist agenda that could do some harm to Virginia. Nonetheless, he was elected by a rather hefty margin after he was able to convince the public that he wasn’t as extreme as his politics would suggest. As he’s now telling colleges they have no right to prevent discrimination, wasting tax payer money on a lawsuit against allowing people to have access to affordable health care, and wasting even more money on another lawsuit because he doesn’t like that the EPA was using science as the basis for a law, Cuccinelli has gone a long ways to proving that he is indeed an extremist that will be setting Virginia back decades if he’s successful.

As he’s working on doing a significant amount of damage to our Commonwealth, Cuccinelli actually seems to be rather proud of the fact that he’s turned the AG’s office into a law firm that promotes his own political agenda instead of one that stands up for the public. During a speech in Lynchburg, for instance, the News Advance reports he said that his job has “been pretty boring” besides the actions that promote his partisan agenda.
Cuccinelli spent more than an hour explaining to about 100 chamber members that he was “on the right side” on three high-profile issues: a suit that challenges the EPA over scientific data that was used in its greenhouse-gases finding; another lawsuit that says the federal health-care bill is unconstitutional; and a letter in which he advised colleges that they can’t legally designate sexual orientation as a protected class.

Other than those issues, his 2 ½ months in office “have been pretty boring,” Cuccinelli said, as the audience in Liberty University Law School’s Supreme Court room chuckled.
In other words, he finds the important public safety aspects of the AG's office to be "pretty boring." Now there were a lot of people who warned about how Cuccinelli wasn't the best candidate if you wanted someone who would actually work on issues that could actually improve the lives of Virginians and keep them safe. During the campaign, for instance, we even saw clear evidence of how he might ignore these issues because Cuccinelli constantly mocked the fact that Steve Shannon focused on his background as a prosecutor and his desire to fight public corruption, prosecute internet predators, and be a consumer advocate.

What makes the situation even worse is that in addition to joking about how his job is "boring" when he's not wasting taxpayer money on frivolous lawsuits, he doesn't seem to care about how the vast majority of his constituents disagree with his actions. Del. Scott Surovell, for instance, tweeted about how he told Cuccinelli that "95% constituent feedback [regarding the healthcare lawsuit] was extremely negative" and that Cuccinelli responded by suggesting that there's "an election in 3.5 years and they should vote." This essentially means that Cuccinelli not only finds public service "pretty boring" unless it means promoting an extremist agenda, but doesn't care what his constituents think about his actions. I don't know about you, but that's not the type of leadership that I expect from my elected officials.

Left of the Hill · Krystal Ball Wins Democratic Nomination in the 1st CD RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

There has been a lot of energy surrounding Krystal Ball's campaign for Congress in Virginia's 1st Congressional District because so many people realize that she's a strong progressive who isn't afraid of standing up for her beliefs. This energy has resulted in her dominating the caucuses and sweeping the delegate totals at many of them. After sweeping yet another caucus over the weekend, it became mathematically impossible for her opponent, Scott Robinson, to win enough delegates at the remaining caucuses to secure the nomination. With that in mind, he issued a statement yesterday conceding
When we started this campaign seven months ago, I had just retired from a 25-year career in the United States Army and was attempting to catch up to my would be opponents by building a political operation from scratch. The factors surrounding that short amount of time proved to be a daunting task. That is why I will be changing directions and am putting aside my aspirations to serve in Congress for now.

I wanted to send you this note so that you would be the first to know of my decision and also be the very first to know how much you meant to me during this campaign. Your support, your financial contributions and most of all, your friendship have made this transition from the military to the political arena much more meaningful.
I'm pleased to see that Robinson made the decision to drop out of the race in a respectable manner because I do believe that he can have a role to play in the political process in the future. After all, he has already served in uniform for over two decades and could potentially help our country on national security issues.

There is one thing I want to draw attention to, however, because I take issue with how his email casts both Krystal Ball and the Republican incumbent in the same boat of having an advantage in terms of a "political operation." While it is indeed true that they both were further along that Robinson was in his campaign, it would be wrong to lump both Krystal Ball and Rob Wittman into the same category. I say this because Krystal has indeed gone through great efforts to build up her base of support through grassroots organizing and inspiring her potential constituents, which is a major reason that she was able to sweep so many of the caucuses. Wittman, on the other hand, got into Congress during a low turnout special election that hardly anyone was paying attention to and has now secured the backing of the entrenched Republican establishment. The grassroots support of Krystal's campaign that involves so many local community members therefore is drastically different from the RNC backed campaign of Rob Wittman.

All that being said, I'm very pleased to see how the residents of Virginia's 1st Congressional District are rallying behind Krystal's candidacy. The 1st CD is going to be a tough race for Democrats to win, but a strong grassroots effort like the one Krystal is putting together could make this a competitive race come November.

Left of the Hill · Grassroots Movement Growing to Save Bus Routes in Fairfax County RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

When I was in college I worked for a non-profit opera company that was based in downtown DC (it was actually just a couple of blocks away from the Verizon Center). Even though I used public transportation, it was still a relatively long commute going downtown from the Centreville area. During one of the summers I worked there, I even used the bus system to get to the closest Metro station (which is Vienna in my case). What made that interesting was the closest bus stop to my house was over two miles away, which meant I usually got a ride to the bus stop in the morning and then would walk home in the evening. Although the walk did provide some good exercise, I think it also goes to show how even then the public bus system in Fairfax wasn’t a very convenient option to use (not everyone can get a ride and it's not an easy walk in work clothes).

Unfortunately, it looks like it’s going to be even more incontinent for people in Fairfax County who might want to utilize the public transportation system in our region. In addition to cutting Sunday service, the number of late night routes (which impacts people who work long hours or jobs that aren’t in a traditional 9 to 5 setting), an increasing fares, there are now proposals to cut seven different bus routes. Since these proposals aren’t set in stone, however, there has been a grassroots movement of people speaking out against the potential changes that was started by a woman named Deloris Bailey after she heard that the bus route she uses was going to be cut. As the Washington Post points out, she’s been working hard to make sure the public is aware of these changes.
Now, what started as a few e-mail exchanges among concerned riders has grown into a movement to save the Dulles corridor buses. Bailey created a Web site and Facebook group to help promote discussion. She also organized an online petition that has more than 250 signatures. She distributes fliers on the bus when commuting to and from work.

"It basically got started on the bus," Bailey said about the effort. "There's no meetings. There's no officers."

Her goal is to spread the word and make sure affected riders attend public hearings scheduled for April 6 through April 8 on the budget cuts. Bailey said she has spoken to several Fairfax officials, who told her to bring as many people to the hearings as she could to help get her message across.
In my experience, the online organizing can definitely have an impact on the members of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors to some degree. It’s having community members attend the public hearings and write letters to their individual Supervisors that truly have the most impact on potential decisions though. That is why I’m extremely pleased to see that Deloris is making sure that people know about the upcoming hearings. With that being said, if you can’t make it to the hearings but you care about easing the burden on our congested roads and allowing people to have an affordable and convenient way to get to work, then I encourage you to the very least sign onto the petition that Deloris started.
line 3 column 2077 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&ref"
line 3 column 2088 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&sid"

Left of the Hill · Tim Kaine on Michael Steele's Refusal to Sign Statement Condeming Dangerous Rhetoric RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

I think this really says something about the difference between the leadership of the two major political parties. In a time when Tim Kaine and other Democratic leaders are trying to speak out against dangerous rhetoric, he reached out to Michael Steele about putting out a joint statement condemning hateful speech. Steele refused to sign onto the letter and then sent out a press release blasting the Democrats for fanning the flames of violence (even though it's Republican members of Congress who have been associating with people using violence and are shouting out things like "baby killer" on the floor of the House), which I think says a whole lot about the GOP priorities. That is a real shame because we need members of both parties to stand up and make it clear that we can disagree without being disagreeable.

line 3 column 968 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&color1"
line 3 column 984 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&color2"
line 3 column 1000 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 1009 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&feature"
line 3 column 1033 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 1040 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 1091 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 1146 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 1202 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&color1"
line 3 column 1218 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&color2"
line 3 column 1234 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 1243 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&feature"
line 3 column 1267 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 1154 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · GOP Spokesman Condones Violence Against Perriello's Family RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

There has been a lot of talk about the hate and extremist rhetoric that has come out of some Tea Party members and the potential violence it might create. While there have been some people who might want to defend the rhetoric used by some Tea Party activists, even some of the officials supported by the tea party have tried to distance themselves from the threats and violence committed against Tom Perriello and his family. As Lowell points out, this includes Ken Cuccinelli and Bob McDonnell.
In the past 24 hours, several Republicans - Ken Cuccinelli, Bob McDonnell, Lawrence Verga, etc. - have condemned acts of violence or threats of violence against Tom Perriello. For instance, Verga says, "If you disagree with him then don't vote for him in November, but promoting and/or committing any act of violence toward him or his family should not and will not be tolerated." Cuccinelli called the posting of Perriello's brother's address, "appalling," adding, "I think that is way over the line. I don't think it's even close." And Bob McDonnell chimed in as well: "I certainly condemn anybody using any acts of vandalism or violence to express their opinion...That's not the way we do business in Virginia."
Although I definitely disagree with how Cuccinelli and McDonnell have been trying to empower the tea party in the past, I'll give them credit for standing up against violence as a part of the political debate. I also hope that they'll step up their effort on this front by trying to stamp out the extremist rhetoric that's being used and refuse to associate with the tea party when it promotes hatred in the future.

With that being said, it appears as though there are a some folks in the GOP leadership who aren't interested in doing that. In an article on the backlash the Tea Party has launched against Tom Perriello due to his support of health care reform, the National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Andy Sere was quoted suggesting that this type of violence was inevitable and that Perriello wasn't a victim.
"Central and Southside Virginians are the ones who are going to have the bear the burden of increased taxes," he said. "What you're seeing is a frustration among his constituents who believe he's not listening to them."
This is extremely disturbing on many fronts. Not only is a Republican Party spokesman essentially condoning violence against an innocent person (Perriello's family in this case), but he's actually trying to use that violence to score political points. That type of behavior isn't acceptable when it's use by extremists in the Tea Party and it certainly isn't acceptable for a leader in the GOP. As Lowell points out, this means that Republican elected officials and party leaders have a very clear choice. They can join with the vast majority of Americans and "unequivocally condemn violence and incitement to violence" or they can "condone it and end up with blood on [their] hands." In the past these so called leaders have tried to attach themselves to the dangerous rhetoric promoted by the tea party but, after we have received a glimpse of what that rhetoric can lead to, most reasonable people now agree they now have a responsibility to help put an end to that dangerous and violent type of activity.

Left of the Hill · Sharp Contrast Between Cuccinelli and True Leaders at State Level RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

While Virginia's Attorney General is moving forward with a frivolous lawsuit trying to overturn health care reform with the full support of Gov. Bob McDonnell, the majority of governors realize the importance of this legislation and believe it's in the best interests of their constituents. After President Obama signed the bill yesterday, the Democratic Governor's Association issued a statement expressing its support of health insurance reform.
“Today’s historic signing is a victory for the millions of working families and small businesses in our states. We applaud President Obama and the leaders in Congress who demonstrated the courage of their convictions to make this day a reality,” Governor Markell said. “Our Governors are fully focused on creating new and better jobs in our states. Health care is very much an economic issue. So many of our middle class families and small business owners have told us that years of rapidly rising costs for health care premiums have been major obstacles to their economic growth. This bill helps unleash their economic potential.”

“Seven presidents tried to reform health care and President Obama finally led us to a solution,” Governor O’Malley said. “In each of our states, we can now build on our existing efforts to expand health care reform, control costs and put Americans back in charge of their health care decisions. These historic reforms signal our party’s commitment to all Americans that we will stand up for them, we will make life better for the middle class and we will fight to put this country back on strong economic footing.”
So despite the fact that Ken Cuccinelli is willing to waste taxpayer money while trying to overturn a crucial piece of legislation, there are other statewide elected officials who realize the importance of standing up for the American public. While recent events have help to prove just how out of touch with reality Cuccinelli and McDonnell are, the contrast between Cuccinelli's response to the passage of health insurance reform and that of state leaders like Gov. O'Malley and Gov. Markell shows how his actions are outside of the mainstream. When you consider that we just had to cut hundreds of millions of dollars from our education budget and billions from other programs, Cuccinelli's extremist agenda not only goes outside of the mainstream but is actually detrimental to Virginia (the funds spent on this frivolous lawsuit would be better utilized on things such as funding our schools during these tough economic times).

Unfortunately, Virginians will have to deal with this for the next four years as Cuccinelli appears content on continuing these types of actions. Perhaps someone should let Gov. McDonnell know that instead of supporting his Attorney General, he should point out how Cuccinelli's behavior actually represents that type of action that is "detrimental to the family." Somehow I don't think that'll happen though.

Left of the Hill · Krystal Ball Puts Out New Campaign Video RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

I put up a post yesterday which highlighted how Krystal Ball had been endorsed by the Progressive Change Committee. For those of you who might not know much about Krystal, here's a brief video that the campaign put out yesterday that gives some background information. You can also read the interview that Lowell put up on Blue Virginia.

line 3 column 654 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&server"
line 3 column 671 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&show_title"
line 3 column 684 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&show_byline"
line 3 column 698 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&show_portrait"
line 3 column 714 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&color"
line 3 column 721 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fullscreen"
line 3 column 797 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&server"
line 3 column 814 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&show_title"
line 3 column 827 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&show_byline"
line 3 column 841 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&show_portrait"
line 3 column 857 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&color"
line 3 column 864 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fullscreen"
line 3 column 738 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · Photo Slideshow From Immigration Reform March on the National Mall RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

I was down on the National Mall yesterday to take part in the march for immigration reform. I'll be putting up a write up of the event tomorrow, but here are some photos that I took while there. As I was in the middle of the crowd I didn't really get any shoots that truly show how huge the crowd was, but I'd say there was about 200,000 people who all brought a positive message with them and spoke about how great America truly is. Hope you enjoy the photos.

line 3 column 588 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&lang"
line 3 column 599 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&page_show_url"
line 3 column 677 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&page_show_back_url"
line 3 column 753 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&set_id"
line 3 column 778 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&jump_to"
line 3 column 789 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 880 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 932 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 1090 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&lang"
line 3 column 1101 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&page_show_url"
line 3 column 1179 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&page_show_back_url"
line 3 column 1255 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&set_id"
line 3 column 1280 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&jump_to"
line 3 column 940 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · Gerry Connolly's Statement on Passage of Health Care Reform RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

By now you are probably all aware of the fact that the House of Representatives stood up to health insurance companies and passed health insurance reform. After listening to what his constituents had to say about the bill, Rep. Gerry Connolly was joined the majority by supporting reform. After last night's final vote took place, he released the following statement.

“Tonight, the Congress made history by sending to the President landmark legislation that will better the lives of tens of millions of American families and tens of thousands of families in Northern Virginia.

“After more than a year’s work, we have fulfilled a promise I made to my constituents. This is not a new concept or a new process. For more than 100 years, since the presidency of Teddy Roosevelt, Democratic and Republican presidents and Congresses have attempted to enact meaningful health care reform in this country. Tonight, we succeeded.

“The Passage of this reform legislation will stop insurance company abuses, rein in health care costs for families and small businesses, strengthen and guarantee the solvency of Medicare for our seniors, reduce the deficit by $1.2 trillion, retain access to doctors and health plans, and expand quality health care to more than 30 million Americans.

“This legislation rivals the passage of the Social Security and Medicare laws in terms of how it will improve the lives of all Americans and for future generations. For 30 million Americans who lack health insurance and for the 14,000 Americans who lose their health insurance each day, this was a life-changing, and sometimes lifesaving, vote.

“Tonight the U.S. House of Representatives put principle above politics. This was not an easy vote, but it was the right vote for the 11th Congressional District of Virginia and our nation.”

Left of the Hill · Progressive Change Campaign Committee Endorses Krystal Ball RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Although we have plenty to celebrate after Congress has stood up to health insurance companies by passing reform legislation, there is still a lot of work left to do. That is why the Progressive Change Campaign Committee is already looking at candidates to support in the 2010 elections and this morning they sent out an email announcing that they support Krystal Ball in Virginia's 1st Congressional District. Following up on last night's historic vote, the PCC highlighted how Krystal supports the public option and would sign on as a co-sponsor to Alan Grayson's "Medicare You Can Buy Into Act" if she were elected.

It's also worth noting that this endorsement comes before the primary is even over. This is worth paying attention to because it makes it clear that the Progressive Change Campaign Committee isn't just interested in endorsing whichever candidate receives the Democratic nomination, but wants to support candidates that are interested in truly standing up for the best interests of their potential constituents.

In the email announcement, the PCCC also announced that it would be having staffers work in the 1st CD to help highlight why Krystal should be elected to Congress. Since an effective ground game will be crucial in Krystal's attempt to defeat an incumbent Republican in slightly Republican leaning district, having extra staff out in the field will most definitely be useful. Plus, when you combine that with the fact that Krystal was in the first pair of candidates the organization endorsed, I think this also shows that the Progressive Change Campaign Committee really wants to see Krystal elected and is going to do much more than just send out an email or two.

Left of the Hill · Gerry Connolly to Vote Yes On Health Care Reform RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

We received some excellent news today as Gerry Connolly announced that he will be voting for the health insurance reform bill that is coming up for a vote tomorrow. Based upon conversations I've had with Gerry and speeches that I've heard him give, I knew he strongly believed that we needed health insurance reform but that he was struggling with certain aspects of the bill. As the old saying goes, however, you can't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Although you can see Connolly's full statement, including a long list of some of the bill's benefits, on his website, here's a portion that's worth paying attention to if you live in the 11th.
In the 11th Congressional District of Virginia, Connolly said the legislation will: lower premiums by 14 to 20 percent for the self-employed and others who purchase their own insurance, provide tax credits and other assistance to help 87,000 families and 16,800 small businesses afford coverage, and protect more than 1,400 families from medical bankruptcy in the next year alone.

“These are meaningful reforms for which Democrats, Republicans, and the American people can be proud,” he said. “Contrary to what some might contend, this is a bipartisan bill. The House and Senate bills include distinct Republican ideas and amendments. In fact, 147 of them are in the bill before us today. But rather than engage in a rational, thoughtful debate on this complex and critical reform, the organized opposition has preyed on the public’s fear and anxiety and repeatedly fallen back on bumper-sticker slogans.”

“Right now, 14,000 Americans lose their health care coverage each day because of out-of-control costs. We cannot afford to delay any longer,” Connolly said.
Now Pat Herrity and Keith Fimian have been trying to reach out to the Tea Party and sending out emails that call Gerry names (Pat Herrity seems to like calling him Gerry Pelosi), but they don't actually take the time to propose their own ideas or do anything except promote the falsehoods spread by the Tea Party folks. As the video below shows, this shouldn't be too surprising as it's pretty clear that Pat Herrity, Keith Fimian, and their GOP allies on the Hill haven't been doing much to actually give their supporters facts (probably because the facts simply aren't there to support their arguments). This is in direct contrast to the fact that Gerry Connolly and other Democrats on the Hill have been taking the time to hold town halls and communicate with the public about the facts of the legislation.

line 3 column 660 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&sectiontree"
line 3 column 677 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&itemid"
line 3 column 2817 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 2826 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 2831 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 2834 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 2885 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 2940 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 2996 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 3005 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 3010 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 2948 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · Jeff Barnett Introduces Himself By Asking For Money RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Like many people who are involved in the political process, I get tons of emails everyday and many of them are simply emails sent out to their lists either asking for money or some sort of other action. A candidate that has a good communications team in place will send out emails every now and then that simply provide updates on the campaign. Some campaigns even try to use their lists to send out information to their supporters before it makes the info available to the general public (a prime example of this is how the Obama campaign had people sign up to receive a text message announcing who his VP pick would be prior to it being announced). Although the finance shop in some campaigns would like the list to be utilized almost like an ATM and constantly send out requests for donations, I strongly believe that in the early stages of a campaign the list can be more valuable in getting information out about a candidate and including bits and pieces about how people can also get more information.

It appears as though someone on Jeff Barnett’s campaign didn't think of this concept as he sent out an email with the subject line “Please allow me to introduce myself.” When I saw this, I was expecting a good email that included some of his positions on the key issues facing the 10th and perhaps some information about his own background. Now he did point out that he was a 26 year veteran and that he’d lived in Northern Virginia with his wife for a number of years, but what struck me as odd was that while he didn’t lay out how his background qualified him to work on these topics while trying “to introduce” himself, he did manage to ask for money three times. That’s not sticking with the spirit of trying to use an email list to truly interact with grassroots supporters.I have enough commonsense to know that email lists are designed to spur people into action. Heck, I’ve even advised campaigns on how to use their email lists more efficiently in the heat of campaign season. The email the Barnett campaign sent out suggests that they are placing more emphasis on trying to get money out of the people on the list rather than actually giving them information and trying to engage them on the grassroots level. This doesn’t rule out the possibility that the campaign might change it’s focus later in the campaign, but it definitely isn’t a great way to make an introduction.

As someone who has knocked on thousands of doors and made thousands of phone calls into the 10th Congressional District in support of various candidates, I know first hand that it will take a large grassroots effort to defeat Frank Wolf in November. While I’ve seen Rich Anthony spending the time reaching out to the grassroots and expressing an interest in getting more people involved in the political process, I haven’t see the same enthusiasm so far from Barnett. Although I haven’t made an endorsement in this race, this has raised some concerns for me about Barnett’s chances of winning and the style of leadership he would show if elected to Congress. So while people might try to dismiss this as one email, I think it really represents a much bigger picture that I’m seeing from his campaign.

Left of the Hill · Annual Neighborhood Tradition Brings Reminders of Spring and Lessons for Elected Officials RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

As I was out for a walk yesterday enjoying the wonderful weather that we’ve had lately, I walked by Centreville High School and got yet another reminder that it’s spring time. You see, every year Centreville High School has a mulch sale in order to raise money for the school. The mulch always gets dropped off in the school parking lot on a Friday so that groups of students and parents can use the weekend to deliver it. Thinking back on my days at Centreville, this was actually an enjoyable (but exhausting) ritual as the members Senior class all came together to deliver the mulch. Even as people are tired and dirty after loading and unloading the heavy bags all day, everyone still had friendly competitions to see who could lift the most or finish their truck the fastest.

It’s also a great way for the community to support the school and a lot of families get their mulch through the program so they can do just that. I think this is a concept that is important for everyone to remember as our localities are moving forward with discussions about their local budgets. When it comes to things like our schools, the vast majority of people believe we should support our public schools and are generally willing to do their part to help make sure our schools succeed. After all, Vivian Paige was correct when she pointed out that even people who don’t have students in the public schools have a financial interest in making sure that our schools are successful.

I bring this up merely as a reminder that our elected officials should come together and work hard on the issues that would benefit the community. If our officials decide to put community leadership above their own partisan agenda, after all, we’d see a lot more solutions on important issues like health care reform and our public schools. So while I don’t expect everyone to come together like the folks in the Little Rocky Run neighborhood do every year around the CHS mulch sale, I sure do hope that some of our local leaders take that spirit into consideration as the debate moves forward on local budgets.

Left of the Hill · Video of Obama Speaking At George Mason About Health Care Reform RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

For those of you who weren't able to see Obama's speech in person earlier today at George Mason, here's the video. Also don't forget to read my post about the event and check out some of Kenton Ngo's photos.

line 3 column 599 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 650 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 695 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 750 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 865 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&path_to_plugins"
line 3 column 963 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&path_to_player"
line 3 column 1057 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&skin"
line 3 column 1160 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&captions_url"
line 3 column 1174 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&image"
line 3 column 1273 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&controlbar"
line 3 column 1291 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&frontcolor"
line 3 column 1309 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&plugins"
line 3 column 1699 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&captions.file"
line 3 column 1716 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 2026 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&path_to_plugins"
line 3 column 2124 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&path_to_player"
line 3 column 2218 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&skin"
line 3 column 2321 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&captions_url"
line 3 column 2335 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&image"
line 3 column 2434 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&controlbar"
line 3 column 2452 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&frontcolor"
line 3 column 2470 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&plugins"
line 3 column 2860 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&captions.file"
line 3 column 2875 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&stretching"
line 3 column 2891 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&menu"
line 3 column 1724 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · My Reaction to Obama Speaking at GMU Today RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

As the House of Representatives is preparing to move forward on a vote this Sunday, President Barack Obama spoke to a crowd of almost 10,000 people about the current state of health care reform. Although I saw Keith Fimian outside talking to a small crowd of Tea Party folks (Pat Herrity was supposedly there catering to them too), it was very clear that the vast majority of people in attendance were supportive of health care reform. What was also extremely telling to me was that the tea party folks were waiving signs equating health care reform to socialism, displaying posters of aborted fetuses, or claiming that Obama was trying to have the government take over everything. The fact that the tea party activists were so clearly trying to take attention away from what’s really in the bill makes it obvious that they don‘t want people focusing on what‘s actually in the legislation.

Besides the few tea party people there and the Republican candidates trying to get their votes, the people who came out to George Mason this morning were genuinely interested in hearing what the president had to say about health care reform. As I was walking to the Patriot Center, for instance, I spoke with one mother who had brought along her four year old daughter. She had voted for McCain and considered herself a Republican, but she also spoke about how she strongly supported holding insurance companies accountable. So while she disagreed with some aspects of the bill, she was eager to see Congress actually pass this legislation and wanted to provide her daughter with an example of how you can put your differences aside in order to do what’s good for the general public. When I asked her if she could have taught her daughter that by joining the Tea Party, she responded by saying “I’m taking her to hear a civil discussion, not hear people scream lies and obscenities.”

Once I was inside, I spoke with a med student from George Washington University who had come to show her support for health care reform. She spoke about how she decided to go to med school so that she could help people -- especially children (she wants to be a pediatrician). In her view, on the biggest struggles that is facing the medical community right now is the fact that health insurance companies frequently get in the way of treating patients either by refusing to cover critical procedures, not always covering important preventative care, or by simply getting in the way of the doctor/patient relationship. In her opinion, the legislation currently being considered by Congress might not solve everything but it would most definitely be a step in the right direction.

Another person I spoke to was working on his master’s degree at Mason and wants to be a teacher once he finishes. He spoke about how he was forced off his parents plan when he turned 23 and was now paying a “ton of money” for a plan that only covers him if he has “to go to the hospital or get some sort of other catastrophic care.” He was very pleased when Obama addressed this issue during his speech because, as Obama put it, the last thing you should have to worry about when you’re first starting out is whether or not you’ll go broke just because you get sick.

Getting down to what was said during his speech, much of what he said has already been discussed in one form or another. The setting of a college campus and the large number of younger people in the crowd, however, made it obvious that Obama was hoping to primarily reach out to people in their 20’s with this speech. He started out by highlighting how the last time he was on GMU’s campus, it was the beginning of his presidential campaign and people had “counted us out before we even started.” In the end, however, it became obvious that the American people didn’t want more of the same from Washington and voted for change. Of course, one of the changes that people wanted was to see health insurance reform implemented after presidents from both parties had been trying to do just that since Republican Teddy Roosevelt was in office.

On the issue of funding, he mentioned that the bill would cost about $100 billion a year. When a woman in the crowd shouted out “that’s okay,” he spoke about how it’s only okay because they are going to pay for it by doing things such as cutting down on some of the inefficiencies that are currently in the health care system. For instance, there are some programs currently in place that give subsidies to the health insurance companies. Doing away with those subsidies and putting them towards actually providing coverage to the American people will prove very beneficial. There are also some ways to save money by using technology in a way that prevents unnecessary tests. An example Obama used was using electronic communication to share test results instead of doctors 5 different tests that give them same result. When you combine these with other cost saving measures, the CBO has proposed that there will a reduction in the deficit of over $1 trillion in the next two decades. In other words, this is something that will not only allow more people to have access to quality health care but will also ease some concerns of people who are worried about the deficit. The crowd wholeheartedly agreed when Obama therefore concluded that “not only can we afford to do this, but we can’t afford not to.”

Turning to the political aspect of the discussion over health care reform, Obama pointed out how he thinks the media coverage in Washington sometimes make it sound like the health care debate is some sporting even being covered on Sports Center. In a slight jab at opponents of reform, he pointed out how all the “nay-sayers” also claimed that Social Security would lead to socialism even though it’s a program that has saved millions of people from living in poverty. To all the people who suggest that we start over and just pass the legislation incrementally, he pointed out that the time for reform is now. We’ve been struggling to have reform implemented for over a century and the American public should no longer be forced to wait.

A prime example of the need for reform now is a story he told about a single he met in Pennsylvania whose insurance company informed her that her rates were going to be doubled. This meant that she was being forced between helping her daughter get through college or having health insurance. In a time when the costs of both are skyrocketing, there were many people in the Patriot Center who were forced to deal with similar circumstances. It’s situations like the one facing that family that truly draw attention to why we need health insurance reform and the energy in the room was clearly behind reform because the positive response to Obama’s speech was the loudest I’ve ever heard the Patriot Center. As members of Congress have just a few days left to make up their minds regarding the health reform bill, the public support for the legislation that was on display today illustrates how the American people want Congress to stand up to insurance companies and help make sure everyone has access to affordable health care.

Left of the Hill · Rachel Maddow Calls Out Bob McDonnell and Ken Cuccinelli RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Rachel Maddow called out Bob McDonnell and Ken Cuccinelli for pushing an extreme right agenda despite promising during the campaign that they'd govern from the center.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

line 3 column 528 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&width"
line 3 column 538 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&height"
line 3 column 802 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&width"
line 3 column 812 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&height"
line 3 column 682 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · Jay O'Brien Will Seek Rematch Against George Barker in the 39th Senate District RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

In 2007 George Barker earned the nickname "21" by defeating Jay O'Brien in an extremely close race in the 39th Senate district and giving the Democrats the majority in the state Senate. Even in the immediate aftermath of the election, the word on the street was that O'Brien would be running for political office again in the future. There were even some rumors that he'd consider running for statewide office, but he decided not to run after Bill Bolling declared his intention to run for reelection. So with his desires to move up to higher office essentially quashed, it now appears as though he's decided he wants his old seat back in the state Senate. According to Inside Nova, O'Brien just declared his intention to run for the seat in 2011.

Before he gets his rematch with Barker, however, he will likely have to defeat fellow Republican Scott Martin in a primary. Martin is an assistant dean a George Mason and actually ran for the Fairfax County School Board in 2003 but had a very poor showing. Given the fact that O'Brien still has a following in Republican circles and has run successful campaigns in the past, O'Brien has to be the early favorite in the Republican primary. Since that actual contest will be taking place in over a year from now, however, you never know what could happen. With that being said, I imagine George Barker is looking forward to possibility of facing Jay O'Brien again in 2011.

Left of the Hill · Video and Analysis of Gerry Connolly's Campaign Kickoff RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Gerry Connolly’s annual St. Patrick’s Day event has grown from a small gathering that was held in his home during the 90’s to a great event that brings Northern Virginia residents together to enjoy a festive occasion. This year was no different as at least 1,000 people came out to show their support for Gerry Connolly as he officially announced he was running for reelection. What I think is important to note here is that the crowd was extremely diverse group of people who were truly united behind Gerry’s candidacy and were eager to do what they could to help him win another term in Congress. This solidarity and support for Gerry’s campaign should definitely be viewed as a good thing for his candidacy because it shows the support that he has obtained from all across the 11th District, but last night’s event was also in sharp contrast to the events that were held by the two Republican candidates fighting for the right to run against him in November.

Pat Herrity appears to have liked Gerry’s idea of having a St. Patrick’s Day party so much that he held a St. Patrick’s Day party at the Springfield Country Club on Tuesday evening (yes, he couldn’t even manage to hold his St. Patrick’s Day party on St. Patrick’s Day). There has been some controversy in the number of people who attended the event as the independent reports all suggested that only 250 or less could manage to come out to the event, but Herrity’s campaign didn’t quite like these numbers so they sent out an updated number of 400. That move reeks of Herrity trying to compensate for the relatively low attendance, but I’ll be extremely generous and split the difference and say there might have been 325 people there.

Keith Fimian also recently held his kickoff in Fairfax at Brion’s Grille, which is an establishment right across the street from GMU and was a student hangout when I was at Mason. Fimian’s kickoff event there might have reached a crowd of 100 people. From what I’ve heard, however, even that is stretching it. Nonetheless, video from the event shows that he decided to use the event as an opportunity to not only go after the Democrats but to bash his opponent in the Republican primary (Herrity) as well. What this means is that I was absolutely correct when I wrote a post suggesting that this was going to be a bloody Republican primary. Not only are the candidates and their supporters attacking one another, but the low turnout at the campaign kickoffs for the Republicans also suggests that there’s not too much excitement about their campaigns. After all, even if you combine the number of people at both of the Republican events, they still weren’t even half the size of the event Gerry Connolly had last night.

So while the Republicans are obviously divided about how they want to move forward in the 11th and aren’t showing up to events in large numbers, Gerry is attracting a lot of people to his campaign who are clearly energized and looking forward to participating in grassroots action in support of his candidacy. The passion of his supporters wasn’t only apparent in conversations that I had with people who were there (one of whom told me it took him almost 15 minutes to even find a parking space because the lot was so full), but it was obvious that they really liked what he had to say during his speech. After making his way through the crowd and taking the time to speak with as many people as possible, Gerry spoke about how he’s been working hard to get things done on issues such as equal pay for women, extend SCHIP coverage for children, and the need for health care reform.

For those of you who are interested, I have posted video of Gerry’s speech below. What I think is worth taking away from this event, however, is just how passionate people were about doing their part to make sure Gerry was reelected. This was exciting for me to see because there were so many people at this event who aren’t heavily involved in the political process, but still felt strongly enough about this campaign to come out to the event and show their support for Connolly’s candidacy. In a year when the pundits claim it’ll going to be tough for incumbents, I think the grassroots support that was visible at this event will go a long ways in helping Gerry secure a second term in the House of Representatives.

line 3 column 4510 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 4519 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 4524 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 4527 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 4578 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 4633 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 4689 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 4698 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 4703 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 4641 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · Keith Fimian Gets Caught Trying to Blantantly Mislead the Public RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

We’ve already seen how even Republicans don't like how Keith Fimian threw "a temper tantrum" when Pat Herrity ruined his plan to have a clear path to the Republican nomination, but now it appears as though he’s once again trying to blatantly mislead the public in order to gain support. As Roz points out in a post earlier today on the Washington Post’s blog, Fimian accused Gerry of pursuing earmarks instead of being concerned about the deficit.
The ad works on a pig theme and accuses Connolly of going after earmarks at a time when the national debt is rising. Pretty standard political stuff.

But then, the radio narrator tells you this: "Gerry Connolly says, quote, 'I want to be there with all four paws and snout in the trough.' "
The problem is, the quote is taken completely out of context in hopes that nobody would take the time to investigate what Gerry was really talking about. As Roz points out, Gerry was actually going after Eric Cantor hypocritically attacking the stimulus on the national political scene while bragging to his constituents about how it will do a whole lot of good for the local community.
[Gerry] was making a point about Republican Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), who he accused of touting dollars for his district after campaigning against the stimulus plan. Here was the full quote from Connolly:

"You can't have it both ways. You can't on the national stage say this is a bad bill ... but when it comes to my district I want a big chunk of that money. I want to be there with all four paws and snout in the trough."
Now it’s rather obvious that Fimian didn’t want people to actually look at the source of this quote because it really highlights how hypocritical Eric Cantor can be. That hypocrisy isn’t something Fimian would want to receive a lot of attention because his campaign is constantly highlighting how Cantor is supporting his candidacy. Fimian had even more motivation to hide the true context of the quote because Cantor is a member of the GOP’s leadership in the House of Representatives, which means the hypocritical GOP whip is someone who Fimian would be looking to for advice in Congress. Furthermore, Cantor's position in the leadership means that drawing attention to the real quote wouldn’t win Fimian many friends from the Republican house membership and he’s hoping they'll help willing to help him during the campaign.

Considering all the negatives that could result from people hearing the full story surrounding what Gerry said and the fact that Fimian did his best to hide the real context, the only reasonable conclusion we can come to is that Fimian hoped nobody would actually investigate the quote that was used in the radio ad. In other words, he hoped he could blatantly mislead the public and get away with it in order to gain a few votes. If he’s already unwilling to be straightforward with the public when his actions don’t necessarily have an impact on our lives, how are we supposed to trust that he’ll make the right decisions if he’s elected to Congress. Hint: We can’t.

Left of the Hill · This Explains Cuccinelli's Hypothetical: Barack Obama is Irish! RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

I guess the reason Cuccinelli was able to claim he was only answering "a hypothetical legal question" was because he thinks Obama was born in Ireland -- not Kenya like his he was recorded suggesting in an interview.



Happy St. Patrick's Day everyone!
line 3 column 461 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 470 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 475 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 478 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 529 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 584 - Warning: discarding unexpected </param>
line 3 column 640 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&hl"
line 3 column 649 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&fs"
line 3 column 654 - Warning: unescaped & which should be written as &amp;
line 3 column 592 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · Obama to Speak At GMU About Health Care Reform on Friday RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

There are a number of events this week (including Gerry Connolly's famous St. Patrick's Day event tonight), but there's been a lot of discussion about how President Obama will be speaking about health care reform at George Mason's Patriot Center on Friday. The doors will open at 9am with the actual program scheduled to begin at 11:30, but anyone who has been to a presidential event knows that you have to get there early.

This isn't the first time that Obama's been to GMU. He was there in February of 2007, about a week before he actually launched his presidential campaign and spoke to thousands of students who lined the halls of the Johnson Center (Mason's primary student union) to hear what the then junior Senator from Illinois had to say. Even at that point in time the energy surrounding his campaign was amazing and it was great to see so many young people excited about the political process.

It's also worth noting that with health care reform at such a crucial point in the legislative process, it just might happen that the House is voting on the legislation relatively shortly after Obama's appearance at Mason. What he has to say during his at my Alma Mater will therefore be heavily scrutinized by both the pundits and community leaders who be looking at the speech for any indicators it might give about where the legislative process stands. For those of you who are interested, I am planning on being at the event and will be providing coverage of both the speech and the reaction from people in the audience.

Left of the Hill · Gerry Connolly Discusses Health Care Reform on CNN RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

Gerry Connolly was on CNN this morning discussing the fate of the health care reform bill. Perhaps the most important aspect of the interview is how Gerry talks about how health care reform is something that absolutely needs to get done and that he believes that creating meaningful reform is more important than his own political future. When you combine that sentiment with the fact that action needs to be taken immediately, that is why he voted for the last bill even though he doesn’t like every aspect of the bill and will likely do so again.This concept is something that I’ve heard Gerry speak about both at public events and in private conversations that we’ve had, so I’m confident that he wasn’t just taking this position in order to look good in a news report.

Another interesting aspect of the interview is that it also highlights how Connolly hasn't heard from either President Obama or his chief of staff Rham Emmanuel about health care reform. Now you would think the White House would want to make sure they had the support of all Democrats from swing districts, but Gerry's one of the Members of Congress you'd think they'd really want to reach out to. Not necessarily because of his individual vote on the bill, but because he's the president of the Freshman class of Democrats in the House and is in the position to potentially help the White House with other freshmen. This piece therefore really does raise some questions about the White House's leadership on health care reform.

line 3 column 1910 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&videoId"
line 3 column 2114 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&videoId"
line 3 column 2013 - Warning: <embed> is not approved by W3C

Left of the Hill · Some More Context for Ken Cuccinelli's "Birther" Comments RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

During the last 24 hours the news has spread like wildfire that Ken Cuccinelli has once again proven that he deserves to be associated with the extreme right wing fringe. During an interview he gave between the time he was elected Virginia’s Attorney General in November and was sworn into office in January, Cuccinelli appears to have publicly admitted he’s a member of the “birther” movement by claiming it “doesn’t seem beyond the realm of possibility” that President Obama was born in Kenya. To top it off, the audio of the interview, which was posted by Ben Tribbett of NLS, also reveals that he passionately spoke about how he could potentially play a role in discrediting Obama’s presidency.
Q What can we do about Obama and the birth certificate thing?

Cuccinelli: It will get tested in my view when someone… when he signs a law, and someone is convicted of violating it and one of their defenses will be it is not a law because someone qualified to be President didn’t sign it.

Q: Is that something you can do as Attorney General? Can you do that or something?

Cuccinelli: Well only if there is a conflict where we are suing the federal government for a law they’ve passed. So it’s possible.
Now Cuccinelli has come out and said that he was simply answering “a hypothetical legal question” and that he doesn’t really believe Obama was born in Kenya. Due to Cuccinelli’s recent bouts of extremism, however, his credibility is shot and it’s extremely difficult to actually take him at his word on this issue. Ignoring the fact that he recently wrote a letter to colleges and universities in Virginia saying they can’t prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation, this isn’t even the first time that he’s proposed some sort of government conspiracy. As the folks over at Right Wing Watch remind us, for instance, Cuccinelli once claimed that he might not get his child a Social Security number because “it’s being used to track you.” In other words, our Attorney General is speculating about how he could prove that President Obama was born in Kenya and about how people shouldn’t have a social security number because it’s a way that big brother is conspiring against the public.

Now most progressive activists, especially those of us from Northern Virginia, knew that we should be worried about what Cuccinelli would do if he were elected Attorney General because we’ve been seeing his extremism first hand for years. I even had several Republican leaning acquaintances that he represented in the state Senate tell me that they were worried about what he’d do as AG. Despite many of us knowing the truth about Cuccinelli, the fact that he performed well on the campaign trail and came across as a good guy meant that a lot of voters simply didn’t see the extremism that he’d bring to the office. After only a few short months in office, however, it appears as though people are beginning to look past all the smoke and mirrors. The question we must now ask ourselves is “how can we prevent Cuccinelli’s extremism from damaging the great Commonwealth of Virginia?”

Although there is a lot of work that must be done to prevent Cuccinelli’s fringe beliefs from causing damage, the blogs on both the national and local level have joined forces with other grassroots activists to help prove how simply drawing attention to Cuccinelli’s actions can go a long way. After the public became extremely outraged over Cuccinelli’s letter to colleges promoting discrimination, for example, Gov. McDonnell desperately tried to distance himself from his fellow Republican and made it at least slightly harder for discrimination to take place (though there still needs to be a lot of work done on that issue). Plus, both McDonnell and Cuccinelli have lost a lot of credibility as it’s become apparent that they don’t plan on following through on their campaign promises to govern from the center.

As we move forward, I think the most obvious path at the moment is that bloggers and other activists must continuing making sure that Cuccinelli and the other right wing Republicans in office cannot get away with trying to move Virginia backwards. There are some rumblings of potential projects moving forward to make sure this happens, but whatever happens Cuccinelli’s recent actions suggest that we all have a lot of work ahead to make sure he’s held accountable for what he says and does while in the AG’s office.

Left of the Hill · VOP Presents Check To Governor's Office After Holding "Bake Sales for the Budget" RSS Comment Feed Bookmark on del.icio.us

The possibility of raising taxes is one that politicians generally try to avoid discussing because they don't want what they say about the topic to be taken out of context and used against them in the next election. The Virginia Organizing Project (VOP), however, held a series of "bake sales for the budget" last Thursday to help prove that many Virginians would be willing to pay a little more if it meant that the crucial services wouldn't have to be severely cut. When delivering a check of $921.01 to the Governor's office, the VOP stressed that they believe the "cuts-only approach to the budget shortfall is irresponsible and will hurt public systems and structures at a time when Virginians need them most."

Of course the VOP wasn't just advocating raising taxes to cover the enormous budget shortfalls that we're facing during these tough economic times. They argued that there needs to be a balance between cuts and changes made to our revenue streams in order to make sure that crucial service can still be provided to the public. Here is what Janice “Jay” Johnson, the Chairperson of VOP, had to say about the topic.
“We are presenting this check today to show that our legislators and our Governor have choices with the state budget. We went out and raised $921.01 in revenue. We wish there could be more zeros behind that number but any small amount of revenue helps.

“We have got to really begin to look at other options for the state of Virginia. We have got to take some serious look, as citizens and as organizations, at the correct approach to this budget crisis. We cannot rely on a cuts-only approach. These cuts touch everybody. This is not about the haves and have-nots. This is about people whose children are disabled who are not going to get the help that they need and about children who will not get a decent education. The cuts are across the board and cutting very deeply.

“When this General Assembly finishes, we will be 'fee’d' to death. What is the difference between charging a million little fees and raising taxes? If it comes out of your pocket, it doesn’t matter if it comes out of the left or the right. It’s still coming out. My grandfather had a saying: If you keep cutting off your wooden porch to feed your fire, eventually you are going to burn your house down. That is where we are in the state of Virginia. We are burning our house down.”
Now I don't know how realistic it is to actually think that we will see politicians in Virginia openly advocating for a lot of revenue increases, especially considering how conservative the Republican controlled House of Delegates has become and how some politicians are afraid of being confronted by Tea Party activists, but I do think these "bake sales for the budget" were a creative way to get some discussion started about the topic. After all, the VOP isn't advocating for taxing people to death, but simply wants our elected officials to consider a balanced approach when trying to decide how to move forward on budget related issues.

Older Items

Search

Title, author, body:

Feed tag:


Active Feed Tags

Feed Comment Activity

High-Traffic Feeds

All Feeds

Other Virginia Aggregators